Hi Steve,I'm flattered that you asked for my input on your 3063 TRO, and I'm cenrtialy happy to help in any way I can. However in the interest of honesty I have to tell you that although I do still play the occasional game of BattleTech, these days I jus
Hi Steve,I'm flattered that you asked for my input on your 3063 TRO, and I'm cenrtialy happy to help in any way I can. However in the interest of honesty I have to tell you that although I do still play the occasional game of BattleTech, these days I just use the 1987 Rules of Warfare book and 3025 tech and designs.My knowledge of the game is more than twenty years out of date and really about all I could do would be to tell you what I think about my general impression of the writing, artwork, and layout used. (Based on what I've seen on The BattleTech Reader, I can safely say that would simply be it's awesome! )
/Well I had the misery of<a href="http://jfepbwedi.com"> leniistng</a> to the first 50 minutes of this, and I'll never get that time back, its gone forever.While I'm quick to find flaws in everything (its my job as an IT director to find better ways to do
/Well I had the misery of<a href="http://jfepbwedi.com"> leniistng</a> to the first 50 minutes of this, and I'll never get that time back, its gone forever.While I'm quick to find flaws in everything (its my job as an IT director to find better ways to do everything, so its in my idiom) and there are plenty in TRO 3063. I must say that ya'll didn't form very efficient arguments, in most cases what you based your arguments on was completely wrong or so biased towards your own opinions of how things should be that it all just came out to be directionless complaining.Some examples:The Hammerhead is fusion powered. Well, its a small vehicle and simply doesn't have the fuel capacity of the transports. Think your car can go as far as an 18 wheeler? Think again. An LB5X is a *great* weapon against smaller support vehicles, especially those that were just published in ATOW Companion that infantry would use. It gives a -1 to hit and an impact is multiple potential critical hit chances. NOWHERE, in ANY book, does it say that an XL engine is more maintenance than a fusion engine. Also, even frontier worlds have millions to billions of people on them, as facts overwrite fluff, the whole mad max feel of BT is trumped by the facts that make at least a few hundred world have billions of people on them. Plus, who do you think has the best military equipment in the world today? Think its the military? Think again, its Xi/Blackwater/etc and the corporations that support the military. If I'm a corporation, even on a mad max world, I'm going to be using those guys to defend my assets, an those guys will have XL engines, pulse lasers, etc.Cost in BT is never an issue. Sometimes its mentioned in fluff, but with the proliferation of XL engines that quadruple the cost of many mechs, it is pretty obvious that in the BTU, the mighty C-Bill simply doesn't matter. A support vehicle isn't a vehicle used for support , its a different rule set for vehicles that are not expected to see combat in most cases. An ammo carrier, that follows around an artillery vehicle, tho its a support unit it is expected to see combat situations. Artillery often faces counter-battery fire, and a support vehicle would just make pretty explosions while the combat vehicle could survive long enough to leave the area. Being fusion powered means the vehicle would be less likely to brew up making any onboard ammo explode, plus would use less internal space as fuel isn't required. PLUS, in the BU-20a/Sabra case, both are fusion powered, which means the vehicles don't have to stop to refuel every couple hundred km, kinda important when battles take place over continents. Just ask the Nazis.Sure, the writing needed work and an editor would have been a GREAT asset. Sure, some of the designs could be duplicated by other designs that already exist in the universe, but find me a canon TRO that you can't say that about. Heck, I even PLEADED with Centurion13 to remove the Dragonfly and Oculus because I hated the artwork without success.Oh, and as a former crewman of an M2A2 Bradley IFV, while the Pentagon Wars was a great movie, the end result after years of that development was the best IFV in the world; a vehicle that even 20+ years later isn't even being considered for replacement; a vehicle that has proven itself in the Desert Storm, Bosnia, and OIF. Its a bad-ass vehicle. The armor sucks, but its not a tank, but it can kill tanks at 3.75km and the M242 25mm Bushmaster is a freaking awesome gun that decimates tanks and infantry alike.Since I hate to complain without recommendations:#1. PLAN your podcast before you start talking.#2. Push mute when you cough, I've had to do it a lot over the last week with the cough I have during online meetings and phone calls.#3. The Tech Manual and Tactical Operations make MaxTech completely obsolete, so using MaxTech for arguments is, well, kinda dated.#4. Learn the difference between handwavium and choice . The changes that were made at the last minute were to make the designs be LEGAL, so there were a lot of HPPCs replaced with BLCs and such. The BLC in 3063 is 100% legal according to the rules of the game (but yeah, advanced, not like we don't have a lot of canon advanced designs these days). A LAC that was introduced in 3068 is *NOT* legal, regardless of what other source may say so, as TM/TO supercedes previous stuff.I'd give TRO3063 a solid B- overall I think, but I'd give your podcast an F-.Sorry, I rambled, so I'll give my own review an F- as well.
of ANY TRO. Canon TRO's are filled full of relaly stupid designs (on purpose, they don't want everything to be munchy) that you could easily say why not do this instead? and it be valid. The thing about TROs you seem to not want to get is that the autho
of ANY TRO. Canon TRO's are filled full of relaly stupid designs (on purpose, they don't want everything to be munchy) that you could easily say why not do this instead? and it be valid. The thing about TROs you seem to not want to get is that the authors are not trying to design the best units, or in many cases even good units. They are trying to add units to a universe with already over 5 THOUSAND of them.If you want a design for some specific purpose, you CAN and WILL find it from canon sources. TRO 3063 wasn't about making a bunch of munchy designs (though I'll admit some do feel that way) but instead just like every other TRO, to give you new pictures and some new fluff to read, and not necessarily show you good equipment.Canon is full of great units that for some idiotic reason went out of favor for some new and improved design that sucked in comparison to the original, so using that as an argument against any product isn't very solid.As for that name thing. Gotta remember, this is over a THOUSAND years in the future. In another few hundred years (if people will stop comparing everything bad to the man) the Hitler name will be forgotten, in 500 years perhaps a new hero emerges that happens to have the name Hitler. By 3050, the name may have changed its meaning entirely, so trying to say a name based on a name from somebody who died a generation ago, that very few people in the world know of, isn't appropriate that is just jumping to conclusions.In BT, every faction uses every technology, period. Everybody has clan stuff, period. Sure, some factions use some tech more than others in fluff, but in rules, its all the same. There is no tech to any specific faction. Perhaps the society stuff like iATMs and Nova, but I'm betting more than a few folks have already built units with those munchy systems.Just make sure when you go off on a rampage in various forums and online about something, you can back it up with something more than just your opinion, otherwise it just appears to be trolling. http://qvroojj.comdebyximk [link=http://dcnsqsgftc.com]dcnsqsgftc[/link]
A VPN is a virtual private network, which generally is used to provide a secure tunnel. The largest of these is of course the internet, and a VPN is the principal way of ensuring some security and privacy when using this vast, global common network. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvH2HQFBNRw
Dreieich 2010 Bild 4
Thank you for consisting of the gorgeous images-- so open to a sense of reflection.
Check out my page :: music online hip hop r&b (go now)
I together with my guys ended up looking at the excellent techniques found on your web site then instantly came up with a terrible feeling I never expressed respect to the site owner for those techniques.
All of the men are already as a result passionate to study all of them and now have absolutely been making the most of them. Appreciation for genuinely really considerate as well as for going for this kind of perfect tips millions of individuals are really needing to be informed on. Our own honest regret for not expressing appreciation to earlier.
Howdy! I could have sworn I've been to this site before but after checking through some of the post I realized it's new to me.
Anyhow, I'm definitely delighted I found it and I'll be book-marking and checking back often!